Serina Mondal alias Piyada v. State of West Bengal and Ors. * Citation: 2018 SCC OnLine Cal 4238 * Writ Petition No.: 4517 (w) of 2018 * Decided on: June 25, 2018 * Decided before: Rajasekhar Mantha, J., High Court of Calcutta FACTS OF THE CASE * This case is a Writ Petition filed before
Tekan Alias Tekram v. State of Madhya Pradesh, CITATION: (2016) SCC OnLine 131 FACTS: In the present appeal, the appellant was aggrieved by the Judgement and Order passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh who reaffirmed the judgement passed by the Trial Court where the accused was convicted under Sec.
RAMESH KUMARI (Appellant) v. STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) AND OTHERS (Respondent) Citation - ((2006) 2 SCC 677) FACTS The appellant in this present appeal challenges before the Supreme Court the order dated 24.01.2002, passed by the division bench of the Delhi High Court. The main issue
AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. AND OTHER VS CHERIAN VARKEY CONSTRUCTION CO. (P) LTD.: (2010) 8 SCC 24 FACTS OF THE CASE The Cochin Port Trust apportioned more or less some construction work to the appellants concerning bridges and roads underneath the agreement dated 20.4.2001. The appellants sub-contracted a part
Suhas Katti v. Tamil Nadu, was the first case in India where a conviction was handed down in connection with the posting of obscene messages on the internet under the controversial section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The case was filed in 2004 and within a short span